Friday, April 15, 2011

Madras HC: RTI Act would apply to DVAC

Order directing the DVAC to furnish information sought under RTI Act upheld


CHENNAI, April 15, 2011

In an increasingly knowledge-based society, information and access to information hold the key to resources, benefits and distribution of power. Information, more than any other element, is of critical importance in a participatory democracy.

A Division Bench, comprising Justices D. Murugesan and K.K. Sasidharan made the observation in its judgment while upholding a single Judge's order directing the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) to furnish the information sought by two persons and, failing which, face action by the Tamil Nadu State Information Commission (TNSIC.)

The Bench observed: "It is only when people know how the government is functioning they can fulfil the role which democracy (has) assigned to them and make democracy a really effective participatory democracy. Right to information is basic to any democracy."

The duo had filed applications under the RTI Act seeking particulars regarding the number of investigations completed, details of persons convicted in four years from 2003-2004, post held by them, charges framed and recommendations made to the Vigilance Commissioner after investigation.

They also wanted to know how many police officers were caught during raids, their names, designation and address, amount recovered from each officer and details of departmental action against them.

As the particulars were not furnished, they preferred an appeal before the Appellate Authority, which also did not furnish the information.

The reason for not giving the information was that the RTI Act would not apply to DVAC as per a G.O. dated August 26, 2008.

The applicants approached the TNSIC, which directed the public authority to furnish the information sought by the applicants.

The TNSIC's order was challenged by the Superintendent of Police (SP), Central Range, DVAC, in writ petitions. By a common order of January 12, 2010, a single judge dismissed the petitions. Hence, the present appeals by the SP.

The government contended that as the High Court had upheld the validity of the G.O, the Chief Information Commissioner should not have given a direction that the information be furnished.

The Bench said that in terms of Section 24 (4) of RTI Act, the State government was empowered to notify that nothing contained in the Act would apply to such intelligence and security organisation, being organisations established by the government.

But, the power to exempt from the law was not available to the State government even in case of intelligence and security organisations in respect of information pertaining to allegations of corruption and human rights violations. The application of the notification depended on the nature of information required. As the particulars sought by the applicants related to corruption, the G.O. had no application to the facts of the case.


Visit my Blogs at:
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

The RTI Act was passed by the Lok Sabha (Lower House) on 11 May 2005, by the Raj Sabha (Upper House) on 12 May 2005 and received Presidential assent on 15 June 2005. Parts of the Act came into force upon Presidential assent, but the Act came fully into force on 12 October 2005, 120 days after Presidential assent.

Search our Blog


Subscribe this Blog to your E-mail


This Blog Spot is meant for publishing reports about the usage of RTI Act (Right to Information Act, 2005) so as to create an awareness to the general public and also to keep it as a ready reckoner by them. So the readers may extend their gratitude towards the Author as we quoted at the bottom of each Post under the title "Courtesy".Furthermore, the Blog Authors are no way responsible for the correctness of the materials published herein and the readers may verify the concerned valuable sources.

Dinamani - RTI News